The second piece in Dworkin's essay that annoyed me (annoyance is the right term - there is no theoretical point underlying I think) was in this paragraph:
Well it is nice that the panel expressed sympathy for them. In Plessy the justices were nice too. I don't much care. I rather doubt it meant much to the firefighters that the panel felt a bit sad about telling them they were out of luck (because of their or someone else's race). If it did, then I suppose the African American firefighters now are now comforted. I wouldn't.
I think the panel ruled correctly, given the law before them. I found Sotomayor's explanations of her panel decision and en banc decision completely satisfactory. The Supreme Court decision changed things.
I have difficulty seeing why the racial composition of a fire department is of great import to a community. I find that story, a bit opaque. Firemen do not regulate the populace, they do not have extensive interactions with the community. Dworkin's argument here, a pretty consistent position for him, is ironic in the sense that he seems to have no sense at all of economic strata or the effects of economic position on one's life and experience. It is just race and sex that count for him, not class. That is a mistake.
Comments